Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 02:55

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
"Which K-pop idols do you find breathtakingly beautiful?"
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
4 things everyone must know about vitamin D - Times of India
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Should transgender Ideology be renamed "Gender Revisionism/Biological Denialism"?
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What is Canada’s digital tax and why is Trump killing trade talks over it? - Al Jazeera
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
How can we get rid of viral fever naturaly?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Bond Yields Keeping Climbing. Governments Can Bring Them Down. - Barron's
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.